RESEARCH BRIEF - Researchers collected data for 456 public U.S. companies, examining board characteristics, corporate sustainability performance, and corporate financial performance over a five-year span.
The transition to net zero: Is your company ready?

In his annual letter to CEOs, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink urged corporate leaders to prepare as the economy shifts to net-zero emissions, that is, one that emits no more carbon dioxide than it removes from the atmosphere. “As the transition accelerates,” Fink says, “Companies with a well-articulated long-term strategy, and a clear plan to address the transition to net zero, will distinguish themselves with their stakeholders—with customers, policymakers, employees and shareholders—by inspiring confidence that they can navigate this global transformation.”
Fink says companies have until 2050 to achieve this goal, which is the scientifically-established threshold necessary to keep global warming well below 2 degrees Celsius. His recommendation follows a shift across industries to commit to net zero which, between local government and the business community, has doubled in less than a year according to the UN. When considering commitments from just one coalition, Business Ambition for 1.5°C — Our Only Future, 177 companies have pledged to set emissions reductions targets with the aim of reaching net-zero carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 2050—which, if successful, would offset the annual total CO2 emissions of the entire country of France.
Companies such as Microsoft have even taken this pledge a step further in scope and timeline, and pledged going carbon negative by 2030. Competitors are following suit, and for good reason. Besides the obvious world-preserving—and therefore economy-preserving—results from mitigating climate change, emissions reduction efforts just make good business sense. For example, we know from the research that the stock market penalizes firms for increases in carbon emissions, and overall, values companies that proactively disclose carbon emissions more highly. And while increased carbon emissions lead to higher debt financing costs, transparent communication—signaling awareness and providing context—mitigates this effect. It’s no wonder that a majority of executives report that their companies have taken or are planning to take action to reduce GHG emissions.
Related Content
RESEARCH BRIEF - Researchers examined the relationship between CSR ratings and credit risk by analyzing the influence of environmental, social, and governance ratings on different measures of credit risk across U.S. and E.U. firms.
RESEARCH BRIEF - Researchers tested several donation scenarios encouraging varying degrees of creativity...
RESEARCH BRIEF - Researchers studied more than 2,200 companies to analyze the effect of winning any CSR award on financial performance, as measured by Tobin’s Q.
RESEARCH BRIEF - Researchers examined survey responses from 242 nonprofit organizations that received funding from foundations. They analyzed how non-monetary factors in the grantee-grantor relationship are linked to...
REGULATORY RADAR - On May 5, 2022, the DOJ announced a new comprehensive environmental justice enforcement strategy and the formation of an Office of Environmental Justice.
REGULATORY RADAR - On April 28, 2022, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against Vale S.A., a publicly traded Brazilian iron ore producer, for making false and misleading statements about safety...
REGULATORY RADAR - On April 27, 2022, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) announced the formation of two bodies to ensure its corporate sustainability reporting standards are compatible with ongoing initiatives to develop such standards in local jurisdictions.